Thai Legal System, Penalties, and Governance: Lèse-Majesté, Drug Laws, and Immigration Compliance
1. Introduction and Structural Jurisprudence
The legal system of the Kingdom of Thailand is rooted in a civil law tradition that integrates historical Siamese statutory decrees, Buddhist jurisprudence (Thammasat), and European continental codifications adopted during the modernization reforms of King Chulalongkorn (Rama V). Foreign travelers, expatriates, and corporate entities often misunderstand this framework by projecting Anglo-American common-law expectations—such as expansive judicial precedent, broad fair-use speech doctrines, and adversarial police discovery norms—onto the Thai statutory environment.
In Thailand, the rule of law operates through centralized codifications, principally the Thai Penal Code (Criminal Code B.E. 2499), the Civil and Commercial Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, and specialized public-order statutes. While judicial processes are administered by professional judges without jury panels, law enforcement and public prosecutors maintain broad discretion in filing charges, setting bail terms, and managing pre-trial remand.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| THAILAND STATUTORY GOVERNANCE PROFILE |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jurisprudential Foundation: Continental Civil Law System (Inquisitorial/Codified)|
| Judicial Administration: Professional Bench Tribunals (No Jury System) |
| High-Consequence Domains: National Security & Monarchy (Section 112) |
| Narcotics Control & Controlled Herbs Frameworks |
| Immigration Enforcement & Alien Residential Tracking|
| Digital Expression & Computer Crime Ordinances |
| Extraterritorial Reach: Applicable to acts committed online globally |
| affecting national security or protected persons |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The Thai statutory system treats matters involving national security, the dignity of the constitutional monarchy, public order, and state sovereignty with uncompromising severity. International travel advisories published by the United States Department of State, the United Kingdom Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) consistently emphasize that ignorance of local law offers zero defense under Section 64 of the Thai Criminal Code. Navigating this environment requires understanding the Kingdom’s lèse-majesté provisions, controlled substance codes, immigration reporting mandates, and digital speech statutes.
2. Section 112 (Lèse-Majesté) and National Security Frameworks
The most legally sensitive component of the Thai legal architecture is the crime of Lèse-Majesté, codified under Section 112 of the Thai Criminal Code. Embedded in Title 1, Chapter 2—governing “Offences Against the Security of the Throne”—Section 112 provides strict statutory protections for the head of state and key figures of the royal household.
STATUTORY MECHANICS OF PENAL CODE SECTION 112
[ Protected Royal Personages ]
- His Majesty The King
- Her Majesty The Queen
- The Heir-Apparent (Crown Prince)
- The Regent
│
▼ (Statutory Trigger: Defaming, Insulting, or Threatening)
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CRIMINAL CHARGE PROCEEDING │
│ - Mandatory Minimum Sentence: 3 Years' Imprisonment │
│ - Statutory Maximum Sentence: 15 Years' Imprisonment per Count │
│ - Cumulative Count Stacking: Separate counts for each statement/post │
│ - Bail Discretion: Pre-trial detention routinely applied │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Statutory Scope and Textual Mandate
Section 112 states:
“Whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-Apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years.”
Key structural characteristics distinguish this provision from Western defamation or public-figure tort law:
-
Universal Standing to Report: Unlike private libel, where only the aggrieved individual can file a complaint, Section 112 is a national security offense against the state. Any person—including private citizens, police officers, or military personnel—can lodge a Section 112 complaint with the Royal Thai Police against any individual.
-
Mandatory Investigation: Once an official complaint is lodged, investigating officers are legally bound to process the case file. Dismissing a complaint unilaterally risks accusations that the investigating officer is derelict in protecting national security.
-
Consecutive Sentence Stacking: Penalties are applied on a per-count basis. If a defendant publishes ten distinct social media posts or delivers multiple speeches, each instance is charged as an independent offense. In landmark cases documented by legal advocacy organizations such as Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR), cumulative stacking has resulted in sentences ranging from 20 to 50 years of imprisonment for single defendants.
-
Pre-Trial Bail Restrictions: Because courts classify Section 112 matters as serious offenses impacting national security, applications for pre-trial release or bail are frequently denied on the grounds of flight risk or the potential for repeated violations under the Criminal Procedure Code.
Physical Symbols and Currency
The scope of royal protection extends to physical representations of the royal family. Defacing, stomping on, tearing, or burning portraits, royal flags, or ceremonial emblems displayed along public highways constitutes a felony offense.
Crucially, Thai banknotes and coinage carry the likeness of the reigning monarch:
-
Stepping on a sliding or rolling banknote to halt its movement across the floor is viewed as a direct physical insult to the royal portrait, exposing foreign nationals to criminal investigation.
-
Defacing currency, bending coins, or burning paper money carries criminal liability under combined provisions of the Criminal Code and the Currency Act B.E. 2501.
3. Digital Expression, Social Media, and the Computer Crime Act
In the modern digital landscape, the intersection of free-speech perceptions and Thai statutory limitations produces severe legal exposure for foreign travelers, online creators, and corporate analysts.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| DIGITAL SPEECH CONTROL PROVISIONS |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Statutory Instrument Regulated Conduct & Sanctions |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Computer Crime Act B.E. 2550 Inputting forged, false, or distorted |
| Section 14(1) & (2) data damaging national security, public |
| infrastructure, or panic; up to 5 yrs. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Computer Crime Act Inputting offenses affecting national |
| Section 14(3) security or lèse-majesté under the Code; |
| up to 5 years' prison per instance. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Penal Code Section 326 / 328 Criminal Defamation via publication; |
| (Criminal Defamation) up to 2 years' imprisonment + fine; |
| routinely used in consumer disputes. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The Computer Crime Act (CCA) Architecture
Enacted in B.E. 2550 (2007) and substantially broadened by amendments in B.E. 2560 (2017), the Computer Crime Act is the primary instrument governing digital data transmission. Under Section 14(3), inputting into a computer system any computer data that constitutes an offense relating to the security of the Kingdom—which explicitly includes Section 112 violations—carries an independent prison sentence of up to five years and substantial fines, applied on top of underlying Penal Code penalties.
-
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Section 17 of the CCA grants Thai courts jurisdiction over offenses committed outside the territory of Thailand if the uploaded data causes damage within the Kingdom or affects national security. Foreigners posting commentary on social media while in Europe or North America can be detained at immigration checkpoints upon arrival in Bangkok if an arrest warrant has been entered into the national border control database.
-
Secondary Liability for Intermediaries: Under Section 15 of the CCA, system administrators, website moderators, and platform owners who fail to delete or suppress content violating state security laws after receiving official notice face criminal liability matching that of the original content creator.
Criminal Defamation in Commercial and Online Disputes
Unlike Western jurisdictions where defamation is almost exclusively a civil tort settled via financial damages, Thailand maintains Criminal Defamation under Sections 326 and 328 of the Criminal Code:
-
Section 328 criminalizes defamation committed “by means of publication, broadcasting, or sound and video recordings,” punishable by up to two years’ imprisonment and fines up to 200,000 Baht.
-
Online Review Prosecutions: Aggrieved commercial operators, resorts, and businesses routinely file criminal defamation complaints under Section 328 and the CCA against guests who post negative online reviews on platforms such as Google Maps, TripAdvisor, or Agoda.
-
Because truth is not an absolute statutory defense if the court rules the statement was published purely to cause personal damage or commercial harm rather than serving legitimate public interest, travelers posting harsh public reviews have faced formal arrest, passport seizure, and substantial out-of-court cash settlements to secure case dismissals.
4. Narcotics Governance: The Category System and Cannabis Realities
Thailand’s anti-narcotics enforcement is governed by the comprehensive Narcotics Code B.E. 2564 (2021), alongside specialized statutory schedules administered by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) [^1].
+------------------+-----------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
| Category | Common Substances | Personal Possession | Commercial Scale / |
| Classification | | Statutory Threshold | Trafficking Penalty |
+------------------+-----------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
| Category 1 | Heroin, Meth (Ice/ | Prison: 1 to 10 yrs;| Life Imprisonment |
| (Dangerous) | Ya Ba), MDMA (Ecstasy)| Mandatory detox/fine| to Capital Punishment|
+------------------+-----------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
| Category 2 | Morphine, Cocaine, | Prison: Up to 5 yrs;| Prison: 1 to 20 yrs;|
| (Medical/Severe) | Ketamine, Codeine | heavy penal fines | substantial fines |
+------------------+-----------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
| Category 5 | Psilocybin (magic | Prison: Up to 1 yr; | Prison: 2 to 15 yrs;|
| (Residual Plant) | mushrooms), Kratom ex.| fines and seizure | heavy penal fines |
+------------------+-----------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
The Hard Narcotics Grid: Categories 1 and 2
The Narcotics Code treats Category 1 synthetic stimulants and opiates with zero tolerance:
-
Methamphetamine (Ya Ba and Ice): Possessing even tiny quantities triggers swift legal consequences. Statutory amendments have established strict unit thresholds distinguishing simple consumption from presumptive distribution.
-
Possession exceeding statutory thresholds establishes a non-rebuttable legal presumption of intent to traffic, elevating sentencing exposure to life imprisonment or capital punishment (lethal injection) under Section 289 of the Penal Code [^1] [^2].
-
No Foreign Exceptions: Consular missions possess zero legal authority to intervene in judicial proceedings, secure bail, or extract foreign nationals convicted of drug offenses from Thai correctional facilities.
THE CANNABIS REGULATORY TRAJECTORY (2022–2026)
JUNE 2022: Initial Decriminalization
- Cannabis removed from Category 5 narcotics list.
- Massive dispensary boom; recreational gray-zone expansion nationwide.
│
▼
JUNE 2025: Reclassification as "Controlled Herb"
- Public Health Minister reclassifies cannabis flower under Traditional Medicine Act.
- Unlicensed retail sales and recreational consumption formally banned.
│
▼
APRIL 2026: Ministerial Regulation No. 2 B.E. 2569
- Tightened licensing: Dispensaries must maintain certified medical practitioners.
- Mandatory PT 33 medical prescription required for all flower purchases.
- Extracts exceeding 0.2% THC remain strictly prosecuted Category 5 narcotics.
The Cannabis Re-Regulation Paradigm (2022–2026)
The legal status of cannabis in Thailand has undergone dramatic statutory shifts that frequently mislead international travelers:
-
The 2022 Decriminalization: In June 2022, Thailand became the first Southeast Asian nation to remove the cannabis plant from its Category 5 narcotics list, precipitating an explosion of thousands of retail dispensaries operating in a lightly regulated commercial environment.
-
The Medical-Only Reclassification: The regulatory landscape tightened decisively. Through Ministerial Announcements and subsequent regulations under the Protection and Promotion of Traditional Thai Medicine Knowledge Act B.E. 2542, cannabis flower was reclassified as a controlled herb.
-
Mandatory Prescription Mandate: Commercial retail sales of cannabis flower are restricted to medical therapeutic use. Under Ministerial Regulation No. 2 B.E. 2569 (2026), anyone purchasing cannabis flower must possess an official PT 33 prescription issued by a licensed Thai medical practitioner. Dispensaries are required to maintain certified practitioners on-site during all business hours.
-
THC Extracts and Concentrates: Extracts, hashish, vape cartridges, and edibles containing more than 0.2% Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by weight were never legalized; they remain classified as Category 5 narcotics.
-
Cross-Border Prohibition: Carrying cannabis, CBD oils, or related products into or out of Thailand remains strictly prohibited under customs laws. Attempting to cross an international air or sea border with cannabis constitutes international drug trafficking, exposing travelers to severe felony prosecution in Thailand and mandatory detention upon arrival in transit hubs like Singapore or China.
Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping Prohibitions
A common legal trap for tourists involves electronic cigarettes, e-shishas, and vaping devices. Under Ministry of Commerce Notification B.E. 2557 (2014) and Consumer Protection Board Order No. 9/2558, the importation, sale, and possession of electronic cigarettes and vaping liquids are illegal in Thailand [^3].
-
Foreign nationals caught carrying vape pens by municipal police face immediate confiscation, administrative fines up to 30,000 Baht, or criminal prosecution under Section 246 of the Customs Act B.E. 2560, which carries penalties of up to five years’ imprisonment [^3].
-
Extortionate roadside settlements targeting tourists using e-cigarettes in nightlife zones remain widely documented by consular warning desks.
5. Immigration Compliance: Reporting Mandates, TM30, and Overstay Matrix
Foreign nationals entering Thailand do so under the statutory authority of the Immigration Act, B.E. 2522 (1979). The Immigration Bureau of the Royal Thai Police enforces strict residential reporting, employment permissions, and stay limits.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| KEY IMMIGRATION REPORTING CODES |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Reporting Instrument Statutory Mandate & Application |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Section 38 (TM.30 Notification) Landlords/hotels must report an alien's |
| presence within 24 hours of arrival; |
| fines up to 2,000–10,000 Baht. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Section 37(5) (90-Day Reporting) Foreigners staying >90 days must report |
| their current residential address to the |
| Immigration Bureau; 2,000 Baht fine. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Overstay Statutory Bans Immediate escalating entry blacklists; |
| (Interior Ministry Order 1/2558) mandatory detention in the Immigration |
| Detention Center (IDC) pending expulsion.|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The Section 38 (TM.30) Residential Mandate
Section 38 of the Immigration Act dictates:
“The housemaster, the owner or the possessor of the residence, or the manager of a hotel who accommodates an alien who is temporarily permitted to stay in the Kingdom, must notify the competent immigration official within 24 hours from the time the alien arrived.”
-
Hotels vs. Private Condos: Licensed hotels execute this reporting automatically via the Immigration Bureau’s digital portal upon passport intake. However, when renting private condominiums, serviced apartments, or Airbnb units, landlords frequently neglect to file the TM.30 form.
-
Administrative Traps: When the foreign national visits an immigration office to extend a tourist visa, apply for a 90-day report, or convert visa categories, the immigration official will verify the TM.30 database. If the record is missing, the transaction is halted, and fines are assessed against the property owner and tenant before services proceed.
STATUTORY OVERSTAY BLACKLIST MATRIX (ORDER 1/2558)
[ ALIEN SURRENDERS VOLUNTARILY ] [ ALIEN IS APPREHENDED / ARRESTED ]
Stay Overstayed Re-Entry Blacklist Stay Overstayed Re-Entry Blacklist
───────────────────────────────────── ──────────────────────────────────────
> 90 Days 1 Year Ban 1 Day to 1 Year 5 Years Ban
> 1 Year 3 Years Ban > 1 Year 10 Years Ban
> 3 Years 5 Years Ban ──────────────────────────────────────
> 5 Years 10 Years Ban * Plus immediate detention in the
───────────────────────────────────── Immigration Detention Center (IDC)
* Fines assessed at 500 Baht per day, and self-funded deportation flight.
capped at 20,000 Baht maximum.
The Overstay Framework: Fines and Blacklisting
Exceeding the permitted duration of stay stamped in a foreign national’s passport is treated as an intentional violation of national sovereignty. Under Ministry of Interior Order No. 1/2558, penalties are applied based on whether the violator surrenders voluntarily or is intercepted by law enforcement:
-
Voluntary Surrender at Immigration Departure Checkpoints:
-
Assessed a civil fine of 500 Baht per day, capped at a maximum fine of 20,000 Baht.
-
If the overstay duration exceeds 90 days, a mandatory one-year entry ban is imposed, escalating to a ten-year ban for overstays exceeding five years.
-
-
Apprehension by Police:
-
If stopped by police during routine document inspections, traffic checkpoints, or raids, even an overstay of a single day triggers a mandatory five-year re-entry ban. Overstays exceeding one year incur a ten-year ban.
-
-
The Immigration Detention Center (IDC): Apprehended individuals are remanded directly to the central Immigration Detention Center in Suan Phlu, Bangkok. The IDC operates under high-density carceral conditions. Detainees remain incarcerated indefinitely until they or their families secure funds to purchase a direct, full-fare airline ticket out of Thailand, settle all immigration fines, and fund police escort escorts to the aircraft cabin.
6. Police Interactions, Shakedowns, and Roadside Checkpoint Protocols
Encounters with frontline units of the Royal Thai Police (RTP)—including metropolitan precinct patrols, traffic divisions, and highway police—require an understanding of statutory authority and personal rights under the Criminal Procedure Code.
ROADSIDE POLICE ENCOUNTER WORKFLOW
[Encountering a Police / Checkpoint Stop]
│
▼
[Baseline Demeanor & Document Production]
│ - Maintain absolute politeness; suppress visible anger/frustration.
│ - Present physical International Driving Permit (IDP) and license.
│ - Present passport (or clear photocopy + digital visa stamp scan).
▼
[Physical & Chemical Search Invocations]
│
┌───────────┴───────────┐
▼ ▼
Vehicle / Bag Search Urine / Breathalyzer Testing
- Permitted under - Breathalyzer refusal creates statutory presumption
reasonable suspicion of intoxication under Road Traffic Act.
- Observe search hands - Mandatory compliance for urine drug screenings
directly on bag bags if stop is designated a formal narcotics checkpoint.
▼
[Handling Irregular Fine Demands ("Roadside Settlements")]
│
├─► Insist politely: "Pai Sanam Tamruat" (Let us go to the station).
├─► Demand an official written citation ticket (*bai sang*).
└─► Dial Tourist Police at 1155 for immediate English phone mediation.
Identification Mandates
Under Section 37 of the Immigration Act, foreign nationals must be capable of presenting proof of lawful presence upon the request of competent immigration or police officials. While carrying an original passport at all times carries risks of loss or theft, authorities accept:
-
A high-resolution, color photocopy of the passport photo identification page,
-
Paired with a legible copy of the current entry stamp and visa extension slip, and
-
A digital photograph of the passport stored securely on a smartphone.
However, during travel between provinces or near international land borders, carrying the physical passport is strictly advised.
Roadside Shakedowns and Administrative Fines
Foreign motorists are frequently targeted at checkpoints along tourist corridors (such as Sukhumvit Road in Bangkok, Beach Road in Pattaya, and Patong Hill in Phuket). While many checkpoints are legitimate public safety operations, irregular on-the-spot cash demands occur:
-
The “Informal Surcharge”: Officers may demand immediate cash payments for alleged offenses—such as driving without a helmet, lacking an International Driving Permit, or carrying an e-cigarette—without writing an official ticket.
-
The Station Insistence Protocol: If a traveler suspects an extortionate fine is being demanded, they should remain calm, polite, and state: “Pai Sathani Tamruat” (Let us go to the police station). Officers operating informally are often disincentivized from escorting foreigners to the precinct desk, where official blotter entries and higher-ranking duty officers complicate unauthorized cash transactions.
-
The 1155 Liaison: Motorists have the right to contact the Tourist Police at 1155. A phone liaison with an English-speaking Tourist Police officer will clarify whether the checkpoint fine is statutory and ensure an official receipt (bai set) is issued.
7. Operational Compliance Matrix for Expatriates and Visitors
Mitigating legal risks across the Kingdom requires institutional discipline, situational awareness, and strict adherence to administrative filing timelines.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| LEGAL RISK MITIGATION PROTOCOLS |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1. Public Speech Hygiene: Never discuss, critique, or post online about the |
| monarchy, royal institutions, or royal decrees. |
| 2. Document Redundancy: Maintain digital cloud backups of passport, visa, |
| and TM.30 receipts; carry physical copies daily. |
| 3. Vaping & Contraband Purge: Dispose of all electronic cigarettes, high-THC |
| vapes, and unprescribed psychotropics before trip.|
| 4. Online Review Restraint: Avoid posting aggressive, identifiable negative |
| business reviews while physically in Thailand. |
| 5. Overstay Zero-Tolerance: Track visa expiration dates proactively; visit |
| Immigration 14 days before stay limits expire. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Speech and Cultural Discipline
-
Treat the institution of the monarchy with total formal deference. Refrain from participating in political demonstrations, chanting slogans, or sharing politically contentious graphics on social media networks.
-
Stand respectfully at attention when the Royal Anthem (Phleng Sanrasoen) is played in cinemas, state theaters, or public parks, or when the National Anthem (Phleng Chat) is broadcast over public speakers at 08:00 and 18:00 daily.
Workplace and Employment Boundaries
The Foreigners’ Working Management Emergency Decree B.E. 2560 (2017) strictly regulates non-Thai labor [^4]:
-
Foreigners cannot engage in “work”—defined broadly as exerting mental or physical energy to produce services or value—without an explicit Work Permit issued by the Ministry of Labor or a certified SMART/LTR visa endorsement [^4].
-
Working as an unpaid volunteer, tending an open shop counter, or conducting commercial retail photography without a work permit is an arrestable offense resulting in deportation.
-
Thirty-eight specific occupational categories—including tour guiding, traditional Thai massage, manual masonry, and hair styling—are statutorily reserved exclusively for Thai citizens under royal decree [^4].
By understanding the civil foundations of the Thai legal code, respecting the boundaries of protected speech, complying with housing and visa regulations, and avoiding controlled substances, travelers and residents can ensure safe, lawful engagement within the Kingdom of Thailand.
Footnotes and Official Sources
[^1]: Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB). Narcotics Code, B.E. 2564 (2021): Structural Reorganization, Category Schedules, and Criminal Sentences. Ministry of Justice, Royal Thai Government. Official portal: https://www.oncb.go.th
[^2]: Office of the Council of State. The Criminal Code of Thailand, B.E. 2499 (1956): Section 112 (Offences Against the King), Sections 326–328 (Defamation), and Section 289 (Capital Sanctions). Accessible via: https://www.krisdika.go.th
[^3]: Ministry of Commerce & Consumer Protection Board. Notification Prohibiting the Importation and Sale of Electronic Cigarettes, Hookahs, and Related Vaping Liquids (B.E. 2557 & Order 9/2558). Royal Thai Government Gazette. https://www.ocpb.go.th
[^4]: Department of Employment. Emergency Decree on Managing the Work of Aliens B.E. 2560 (2017) and List of Restricted Occupations for Non-Thai Nationals. Ministry of Labour. Portal: https://www.doe.go.th
[^5]: Immigration Bureau, Royal Thai Police. Immigration Act B.E. 2522 (1979) and Ministry of Interior Order No. 1/2558 Regarding Re-Entry Blacklists for Alien Overstays. Official site: https://www.immigration.go.th
[^6]: Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA). Act on Commission of an Offence Relating to a Computer B.E. 2550 (2007) and Amendments B.E. 2560 (2017). Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. https://www.etda.or.th
[^7]: Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR). Consolidated Litigation Records, Pre-Trial Remand Data, and Jurisprudential Analysis of Section 112 and Computer Crime Act Prosecutions. Legal Documentation Project. https://tlhr2014.com
[^8]: Department of Traditional and Complementary Medicine. Protection and Promotion of Traditional Thai Medicine Knowledge Act B.E. 2542 (1999): Ministerial Regulations Governing Controlled Herbs and Cannabis Flower Prescriptions. Ministry of Public Health. https://www.dtam.moph.go.th
[^9]: Customs Department of Thailand. Customs Act B.E. 2560 (2017): Import and Export Regulations, Prohibited Articles, and Statutory Fines. Ministry of Finance. https://www.customs.go.th
[^10]: Tourist Police Bureau, Royal Thai Police. Legal Assistance Guidelines for Foreign Nationals, Checkpoint Rights, and Translation Services via 1155. Central Operations Command. https://www.touristpolice.go.th